Give every learner the same $10,000 paper starting point, then let a private cohort work through assigned lessons, document a hypothesis, make a paper decision, and review the result. Portfolio performance matters, but reasoning and completed learning matter too. No brokerage account, no real-money trades, and no public student profile.
A lecture can define diversification, volatility, market orders, and position sizing. It cannot show a learner how those ideas interact when a portfolio moves and a decision has to be explained. Traditional stock games often solve that engagement problem by rewarding only the highest short-term return. That can make concentration and luck look like competence.
FVeda Campus keeps the energy of a competition while adding habits that remain useful after the league ends. Portfolio performance leads the score, as students expect, but it no longer decides the table on its own: documented reasoning is the second-largest component, so a student who can explain their decisions places above one who cannot. Educators can use the resulting room to discuss why an outcome happened, how risk was distributed, and whether the process could be repeated.
Each part of the experience gives the next class discussion something concrete to examine.
FVeda creates the private room for your programme and names your organizer. The organizer issues invitation links, and students join with an existing FVeda account or a new one, choose the display name visible to the cohort, and remain invisible to unrelated accounts.
Choose an existing lesson, the permitted asset universe, and the review horizon. Learners explicitly accept the work; an independent private practice record is never pulled into a room without their action.
Each learner writes what they expect, what evidence they will watch, and what would prove the idea wrong before using the separate challenge balance. The exact persisted decision is linked only after the learner confirms it.
Facilitators see stage counts and learning progress. Evidence notes, Coach conversations, Budget, holdings, and trades are never visible to them at all. A learner may deliberately hand one finished piece of practice to the room, and that hand-in carries the argument alone — the claim, what would have disproved it, what happened and the takeaway — never the symbol, the size or what it was worth. Learners keep the lesson in their own durable history either way.
Every signed-in account can open Campus, and an account with no invitation sees an explanation and a place to enter one — never another institution's room, membership, or ranking. Rooms are created by FVeda alone: there is no self-service path to creating an institutional space, at the interface or at the API.
FVeda names your organizer for a specific room. That organizer can promote a professor, teaching assistant, student-club officer, or program administrator to facilitator, issue and revoke invitations, and suspend or restore a membership without deleting anyone's record. Organizer access is scoped to one room and carries no rights in any other.
Read FVeda's privacy boundaries →Paper return is scored on a fixed band: 0% sits at the midpoint, and every percentage point moves the component by 2.5 up to ±20%. The band also caps an exceptional week, so a single outlier cannot decide a term. A learner's score depends on their own return rather than on who else joined, and no individual position or trade is exposed.
Decisions a student wrote a reason for, and reviews they carried through to a conclusion. A finished review counts double a note written at the time, because judging your own thinking afterwards is the part that teaches. Placing trades earns nothing here; only writing about them does.
Consistent learning activity builds the streak score up to a bounded target. Opening the app endlessly or trading more often does not create unlimited points.
Completed curriculum work contributes a bounded score. A learner can improve this dimension through study rather than by taking additional market risk.
No brokerage. All balances, orders, gains, and losses are simulated. Students do not connect a bank or own securities through FVeda.
No investment signals. The AI coach explains concepts and reviews decisions but is constrained against telling a learner what to buy, sell, hold, or allocate.
No public student leaderboard. A league is visible only to its invited members. Search engines receive the public educator explanation, not Campus membership or ranking data.
No claim of accreditation. FVeda credentials record activity completed inside the product. They are not degrees, licenses, identity verification, or regulated qualifications.
Tell us who the learners are, the length of the cohort, and what you want them to be able to explain by the end. We will use that conversation to decide whether the current Campus workflow fits the program before discussing a broader rollout.
Product specification reviewed August 23, 2026 · English-language web access